Overall
- Springfield
- 96.1
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +7.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 96.1). A $100,000 salary in Springfield buys about the same as $107,921 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:WA 96.1→103.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +7.6 RPP
Diff +8.0 RPP
Diff -63.3 RPP
Diff +40.9 RPP
| Category | Springfield | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.1 | 103.7 | +7.6 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 105.0 | +8.0 |
| Services | 155.0 | 91.7 | -63.3 |
| Rents | 75.8 | 116.7 | +40.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 63.3 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield, MA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Springfield is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Springfield to $107,921 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Springfield would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Springfield | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,961 | +$3,961 |
| $75,000 | $80,941 | +$5,941 |
| $100,000 | $107,921 | +$7,921 |
| $150,000 | $161,882 | +$11,882 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.1 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Springfield and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.9 to 7.6 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (24.7 to 40.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Springfield RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.5 | 105.4 | 5.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 101.3 | 3.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 99.4 | 106.0 | 6.7 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 99.1 | 101.9 | 2.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 96.1 | 103.7 | 7.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 7.9% more expensive than Springfield. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 96.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Springfield has the same purchasing power as $107,921 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Springfield are indexed at 75.8 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.