Overall
- Spokane-Spokane Valley
- 100.3
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +3.3 RPP
Spokane-Spokane Valley vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 3.3% more expensive than Spokane-Spokane Valley.
3.3% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 3.3% more expensive than Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 100.3). A $100,000 salary in Spokane-Spokane Valley buys about the same as $103,313 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 100.3 (Spokane-Spokane Valley) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Spokane-Spokane Valley ≈ $103,313 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Rents drives the gap (+19.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:WA 100.3→103.7
TIER-NEAR · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- SAME-STATE Same state · WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Spokane-Spokane Valley
- 105.0
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff 0.0 RPP
Services
Diff +0.5 RPP
Rents
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff +19.6 RPP
| Category | Spokane-Spokane Valley | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.3 | 103.7 | +3.3 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.0 | 0.0 |
| Services | 91.2 | 91.7 | +0.5 |
| Rents | 97.1 | 116.7 | +19.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Spokane-Spokane Valley 100.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Spokane-Spokane Valley 105.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Spokane-Spokane Valley 91.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Spokane-Spokane Valley 97.1
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 19.6 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 3.3% more expensive than Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.3-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Spokane-Spokane Valley corresponds to $103,313 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Spokane-Spokane Valley
100.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Spokane-Spokane Valley would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Spokane-Spokane Valley | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,656 | +$1,656 |
| $75,000 | $77,484 | +$2,484 |
| $100,000 | $103,313 | +$3,313 |
| $150,000 | $154,969 | +$4,969 |
$ in Spokane-Spokane Valley = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Spokane-Spokane Valley and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.1 to 3.3 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 12.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (12.5 to 0.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Spokane-Spokane Valley RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.3 | 105.4 | 10.1 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 97.9 | 101.3 | 3.4 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 96.1 | 106.0 | 9.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 98.6 | 101.9 | 3.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 100.3 | 103.7 | 3.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Spokane-Spokane Valley?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 3.3% more expensive than Spokane-Spokane Valley. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 100.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Spokane-Spokane Valley?
A $100,000 salary in Spokane-Spokane Valley has the same purchasing power as $103,313 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Spokane-Spokane Valley and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Spokane-Spokane Valley are indexed at 97.1 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.