Overall
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 92.9
Diff +5.4 RPP
South Bend-Mishawaka vs Prescott Valley-Prescott
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 5.8% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka.
5.8% more expensive
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 5.8% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka buys about the same as $105,812 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (South Bend-Mishawaka) vs 98.3 (Prescott Valley-Prescott)
- $100k in South Bend-Mishawaka ≈ $105,812 purchasing power in Prescott Valley-Prescott
- Rents drives the gap (+24.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair IN:AZ 92.9→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE IN × AZ
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in South Bend-Mishawaka would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In South Bend-Mishawaka | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,906 | +$2,906 |
| $75,000 | $79,359 | +$4,359 |
| $100,000 | $105,812 | +$5,812 |
| $150,000 | $158,718 | +$8,718 |
$ in South Bend-Mishawaka = in Prescott Valley-Prescott
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 5.8% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Prescott Valley-Prescott 24.2 points higher than South Bend-Mishawaka. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in South Bend-Mishawaka corresponds to $105,812 in Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 94.2
Diff +2.0 RPP
Services
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 87.7
Diff +3.7 RPP
Rents
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 74.6
Diff +24.2 RPP
| Category | South Bend-Mishawaka | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 98.3 | +5.4 |
| Goods | 94.2 | 96.2 | +2.0 |
| Services | 87.7 | 91.5 | +3.7 |
| Rents | 74.6 | 98.8 | +24.2 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
South Bend-Mishawaka 92.9
Prescott Valley-Prescott 98.3
Goods
South Bend-Mishawaka 94.2
Prescott Valley-Prescott 96.2
Services
South Bend-Mishawaka 87.7
Prescott Valley-Prescott 91.5
Rents
South Bend-Mishawaka 74.6
Prescott Valley-Prescott 98.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
South Bend-Mishawaka
92.9
Cost Index
Prescott Valley-Prescott
98.3
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
South Bend-Mishawaka and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.6 to 5.4 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.1 to 24.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | South Bend-Mishawaka RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.4 | 103.0 | 10.6 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 90.4 | 96.5 | 6.1 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2016 | 91.4 | 98.6 | 7.3 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 91.5 | 93.2 | 1.7 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 98.3 | 5.4 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Prescott Valley-Prescott more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka?
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 5.8% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott equals $100K in South Bend-Mishawaka?
A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka has the same purchasing power as $105,812 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between South Bend-Mishawaka and Prescott Valley-Prescott?
Rents in South Bend-Mishawaka are indexed at 74.6 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.