Overall
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 92.9
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 92.9
Diff +0.1 RPP
South Bend-Mishawaka vs Oshkosh-Neenah
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka.
0.1% more expensive
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI is 0.1% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka buys about the same as $100,076 in Oshkosh-Neenah; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 92.9 (South Bend-Mishawaka) vs 92.9 (Oshkosh-Neenah)
- $100k in South Bend-Mishawaka ≈ $100,076 purchasing power in Oshkosh-Neenah
- Services drives the gap (+2.9 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair IN:WI 92.9→92.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE IN × WI
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
South Bend-Mishawaka
92.9
Cost Index
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI and Oshkosh-Neenah, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Oshkosh-Neenah is 2.9 points higher. But goods and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in South Bend-Mishawaka to $100,076 in Oshkosh-Neenah, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 94.2
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 93.8
Diff -0.4 RPP
Services
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 87.7
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 90.6
Diff +2.9 RPP
Rents
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 74.6
- Oshkosh-Neenah
- 74.4
Diff -0.1 RPP
| Category | South Bend-Mishawaka | Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 92.9 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 94.2 | 93.8 | -0.4 |
| Services | 87.7 | 90.6 | +2.9 |
| Rents | 74.6 | 74.4 | -0.1 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
South Bend-Mishawaka 92.9
Oshkosh-Neenah 92.9
Goods
South Bend-Mishawaka 94.2
Oshkosh-Neenah 93.8
Services
South Bend-Mishawaka 87.7
Oshkosh-Neenah 90.6
Rents
South Bend-Mishawaka 74.6
Oshkosh-Neenah 74.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in South Bend-Mishawaka would need to be in Oshkosh-Neenah for the same purchasing power:
| In South Bend-Mishawaka | In Oshkosh-Neenah | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,038 | +$38 |
| $75,000 | $75,057 | +$57 |
| $100,000 | $100,076 | +$76 |
| $150,000 | $150,115 | +$115 |
$ in South Bend-Mishawaka = in Oshkosh-Neenah
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oshkosh-Neenah more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka?
Oshkosh-Neenah is 0.1% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Oshkosh-Neenah equals $100K in South Bend-Mishawaka?
A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka has the same purchasing power as $100,076 in Oshkosh-Neenah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between South Bend-Mishawaka and Oshkosh-Neenah?
Rents in South Bend-Mishawaka are indexed at 74.6 while Oshkosh-Neenah is at 74.4 (national average = 100). South Bend-Mishawaka has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.