Overall
- South Bend-Mishawaka
- 92.9
- Flint
- 93.0
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Flint is 0.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka.
Flint, MI is 0.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.0 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka buys about the same as $100,190 in Flint; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair IN:MI 92.9→93.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI and Flint, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Flint is 9.3 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in South Bend-Mishawaka to $100,190 in Flint, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -0.5 RPP
Diff +9.3 RPP
Diff -0.5 RPP
| Category | South Bend-Mishawaka | Flint | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 93.0 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 94.2 | 93.7 | -0.5 |
| Services | 87.7 | 97.1 | +9.3 |
| Rents | 74.6 | 74.0 | -0.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
South Bend-Mishawaka and Flint share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.6 to 0.2 RPP points. Flint remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.3 to 0.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | South Bend-Mishawaka RPP | Flint RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.4 | 96.0 | 3.6 points Flint higher |
| 2012 | 90.4 | 93.0 | 2.6 points Flint higher |
| 2016 | 91.4 | 90.8 | 0.6 points South Bend-Mishawaka higher |
| 2020 | 91.5 | 89.8 | 1.7 points South Bend-Mishawaka higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 93.0 | 0.2 points Flint higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in South Bend-Mishawaka would need to be in Flint for the same purchasing power:
| In South Bend-Mishawaka | In Flint | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,095 | +$95 |
| $75,000 | $75,142 | +$142 |
| $100,000 | $100,190 | +$190 |
| $150,000 | $150,284 | +$284 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 93.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Flint is 0.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka. The overall cost index is 93.0 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka has the same purchasing power as $100,190 in Flint. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in South Bend-Mishawaka are indexed at 74.6 while Flint is at 74.0 (national average = 100). South Bend-Mishawaka has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.