South Bend-Mishawaka vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 6.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

The Bureau of Economic Analysis indexes South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI at an overall Regional Price Parity of 92.9 and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX at 98.6, using the U.S. national average of 100 as the reference point. That puts Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 6.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka on a blended basket of goods, services, and rents. The raw index gap of 5.8 points matters more than the headline comparison because it flows directly into salary-equivalent math that families use for relocation, job offers, and remote-work arbitrage decisions.

Inside the breakdown, South Bend-Mishawaka indexes goods at 94.2, services at 87.7, and rents at 74.6, while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands comes in at 100.6, 95.3, and 104.5 on the same three categories. The rent line carries the largest weight in the BEA methodology, so a metro with a higher rent index almost always ends up more expensive overall - Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands carries the heavier rent load here, and that tends to dominate household budget experience on the ground.

In salary terms, a $100,000 income in South Bend-Mishawaka has the same purchasing power as $106,215 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands based on these indexes. The two metros serve populations of roughly 324,180 (South Bend-Mishawaka) and 7,274,714 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands), and median household incomes are $65,385 versus $80,458 respectively - so the right way to read this comparison is never the index alone, but the ratio of your expected local salary to the rent and services mix. For any serious relocation or remote-work decision, pair this BEA comparison with BLS occupation-specific wage data, HUD Fair Market Rent tables, and state tax treatment before committing.

South Bend-Mishawaka
92.9
Cost Index
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index

Category Breakdown

Category South Bend-Mishawaka Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Difference
Overall 92.9 98.6 +5.8
Goods 94.2 100.6 +6.4
Services 87.7 95.3 +7.6
Rents 74.6 104.5 +29.9

Visual Comparison

Overall
South Bend-Mishawaka
92.9
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Goods
South Bend-Mishawaka
94.2
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
100.6
Services
South Bend-Mishawaka
87.7
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
95.3
Rents
South Bend-Mishawaka
74.6
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
104.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in South Bend-Mishawaka would need to be in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands for the same purchasing power:

In South Bend-Mishawaka In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Difference
$50,000 $53,107 +$3,107
$75,000 $79,661 +$4,661
$100,000 $106,215 +$6,215
$150,000 $159,322 +$9,322

Use the salary calculator for custom amounts.

Metro Context

Metric South Bend-Mishawaka Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
Population 324,180 7,274,714
Median Income $65,385 $80,458
Data Year 2024 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka?
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 6.2% more expensive than South Bend-Mishawaka. The overall cost index is 98.6 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands equals $100K in South Bend-Mishawaka?
A $100,000 salary in South Bend-Mishawaka has the same purchasing power as $106,215 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between South Bend-Mishawaka and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?
Rents in South Bend-Mishawaka are indexed at 74.6 while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is at 104.5 (national average = 100). Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands has higher rents.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities (2024). Index where national average = 100.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost Editorial