Overall
- Sherman-Denison
- 93.8
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +4.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 4.8% more expensive than Sherman-Denison.
Lancaster, PA is 4.8% more expensive than Sherman-Denison, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 93.8). A $100,000 salary in Sherman-Denison buys about the same as $104,784 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:PA 93.8→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 4.8% more expensive than Sherman-Denison, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.5-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 23.9 points higher than Sherman-Denison. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Sherman-Denison to $104,784 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Sherman-Denison and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.8 to 4.5 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 24.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (29.0 to 4.3 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Sherman-Denison RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 91.4 | 100.2 | 8.8 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 94.2 | 97.8 | 3.6 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 95.4 | 99.4 | 4.0 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 92.4 | 97.9 | 5.5 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 93.8 | 98.3 | 4.5 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +4.5 RPP
Diff +6.9 RPP
Diff +23.9 RPP
Diff +4.3 RPP
| Category | Sherman-Denison | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.8 | 98.3 | +4.5 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 100.7 | +6.9 |
| Services | 83.3 | 107.3 | +23.9 |
| Rents | 89.5 | 93.8 | +4.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Sherman-Denison would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Sherman-Denison | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,392 | +$2,392 |
| $75,000 | $78,588 | +$3,588 |
| $100,000 | $104,784 | +$4,784 |
| $150,000 | $157,176 | +$7,176 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.8 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 4.8% more expensive than Sherman-Denison. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 93.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Sherman-Denison has the same purchasing power as $104,784 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Sherman-Denison are indexed at 89.5 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.