Savannah vs Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 0.4% more expensive than Savannah.

0.4% more expensive

Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI is 0.4% more expensive than Savannah, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.2). A $100,000 salary in Savannah buys about the same as $100,357 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 95.2 (Savannah) vs 95.5 (Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood)
  • $100k in Savannah ≈ $100,357 purchasing power in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
  • Services drives the gap (+5.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair GA:MI 95.2→95.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE GA × MI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Savannah
95.2
Cost Index
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
95.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Savannah, GA and Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 5.2 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Savannah to $100,357 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Savannah
95.2
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
95.5
Goods
Savannah
96.3
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
93.7
Services
Savannah
88.6
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
93.8
Rents
Savannah
86.0
Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood
86.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Savannah would need to be in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood for the same purchasing power:

In Savannah In Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood Difference
$50,000 $50,179 +$179
$75,000 $75,268 +$268
$100,000 $100,357 +$357
$150,000 $150,536 +$536
$ in Savannah = in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.2 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood more expensive than Savannah?

Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is 0.4% more expensive than Savannah. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood equals $100K in Savannah?

A $100,000 salary in Savannah has the same purchasing power as $100,357 in Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Savannah and Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood?

Rents in Savannah are indexed at 86.0 while Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.