Overall
Diff +0.3 RPP
Salisbury vs Logan
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Logan is 0.3% more expensive than Salisbury.
0.3% more expensive
Logan, UT-ID is 0.3% more expensive than Salisbury, MD on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.9 vs 95.6). A $100,000 salary in Salisbury buys about the same as $100,324 in Logan; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 95.6 (Salisbury) vs 95.9 (Logan)
- $100k in Salisbury ≈ $100,324 purchasing power in Logan
- Services drives the gap (-24.9 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MD:UT 95.6→95.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MD × UT
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salisbury
95.6
Cost Index
Logan
95.9
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Salisbury, MD and Logan, UT-ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Logan is 24.9 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Salisbury to $100,324 in Logan, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -0.2 RPP
Services
Diff -24.9 RPP
Rents
Diff +3.7 RPP
| Category | Salisbury | Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.6 | 95.9 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 96.4 | -0.2 |
| Services | 102.8 | 77.9 | -24.9 |
| Rents | 87.2 | 91.0 | +3.7 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Salisbury 95.6
Logan 95.9
Goods
Salisbury 96.6
Logan 96.4
Services
Salisbury 102.8
Logan 77.9
Rents
Salisbury 87.2
Logan 91.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Salisbury would need to be in Logan for the same purchasing power:
| In Salisbury | In Logan | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,162 | +$162 |
| $75,000 | $75,243 | +$243 |
| $100,000 | $100,324 | +$324 |
| $150,000 | $150,486 | +$486 |
$ in Salisbury = in Logan
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.6 → 95.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Logan more expensive than Salisbury?
Logan is 0.3% more expensive than Salisbury. The overall cost index is 95.9 vs 95.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Logan equals $100K in Salisbury?
A $100,000 salary in Salisbury has the same purchasing power as $100,324 in Logan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Salisbury and Logan?
Rents in Salisbury are indexed at 87.2 while Logan is at 91.0 (national average = 100). Logan has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.