Overall
Diff -0.1 RPP
Salisbury vs Yakima
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yakima is 0.1% less expensive than Salisbury.
0.1% less expensive
Yakima, WA is 0.1% less expensive than Salisbury, MD on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.6). A $100,000 salary in Salisbury buys about the same as $99,925 in Yakima; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 95.6 (Salisbury) vs 95.5 (Yakima)
- $100k in Salisbury ≈ $99,925 purchasing power in Yakima
- Rents drives the gap (-14.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MD:WA 95.6→95.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MD × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salisbury
95.6
Cost Index
Yakima
95.5
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Salisbury, MD and Yakima, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Yakima is 14.6 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Salisbury corresponds to $99,925 in Yakima.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +8.4 RPP
Services
Diff -10.9 RPP
Rents
Diff -14.6 RPP
| Category | Salisbury | Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.6 | 95.5 | -0.1 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 105.0 | +8.4 |
| Services | 102.8 | 91.9 | -10.9 |
| Rents | 87.2 | 72.6 | -14.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Salisbury 95.6
Yakima 95.5
Goods
Salisbury 96.6
Yakima 105.0
Services
Salisbury 102.8
Yakima 91.9
Rents
Salisbury 87.2
Yakima 72.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Salisbury would need to be in Yakima for the same purchasing power:
| In Salisbury | In Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,962 | $-38 |
| $75,000 | $74,944 | $-56 |
| $100,000 | $99,925 | $-75 |
| $150,000 | $149,887 | $-113 |
$ in Salisbury = in Yakima
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.6 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Yakima more expensive than Salisbury?
Yakima is 0.1% less expensive than Salisbury. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Yakima equals $100K in Salisbury?
A $100,000 salary in Salisbury has the same purchasing power as $99,925 in Yakima. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Salisbury and Yakima?
Rents in Salisbury are indexed at 87.2 while Yakima is at 72.6 (national average = 100). Salisbury has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.