Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom vs New Haven

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. New Haven is 2% less expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom.

2% less expensive

New Haven, CT is 2% less expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 104.6 vs 106.7). A $100,000 salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom buys about the same as $98,021 in New Haven; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 106.7 (Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom) vs 104.6 (New Haven)
  • $100k in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom ≈ $98,021 purchasing power in New Haven
  • Goods drives the gap (-7.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:CT 106.7→104.6

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE CA × CT
  • GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

New Haven, CT is 2% less expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.1-point overall gap.

Goods leads the difference, with New Haven 7.8 points lower than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $98,021 in New Haven as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, then replace the national basket with your own.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom would need to be in New Haven for the same purchasing power:

In Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom In New Haven Difference
$50,000 $49,010 $-990
$75,000 $73,516 $-1,484
$100,000 $98,021 $-1,979
$150,000 $147,031 $-2,969
$ in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom = in New Haven

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (106.7 → 104.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
New Haven
104.6
Goods
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
105.2
New Haven
97.3
Services
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
151.3
New Haven
144.8
Rents
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
130.2
New Haven
124.3

Vertical line = national average (100)

Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
106.7
Cost Index
New Haven
104.6
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New Haven more expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?

New Haven is 2% less expensive than Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom. The overall cost index is 104.6 vs 106.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in New Haven equals $100K in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom?

A $100,000 salary in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom has the same purchasing power as $98,021 in New Haven. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom and New Haven?

Rents in Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom are indexed at 130.2 while New Haven is at 124.3 (national average = 100). Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.