PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Rome vs Sioux Falls

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sioux Falls is 0.5% more expensive than Rome.

0.5% more expensive

Sioux Falls, SD-MN is 0.5% more expensive than Rome, GA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.6 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Rome buys about the same as $100,521 in Sioux Falls; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.2 (Rome) vs 90.6 (Sioux Falls)
  • $100k in Rome ≈ $100,521 purchasing power in Sioux Falls
  • Rents drives the gap (+17.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair GA:SD 90.2→90.6

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE GA × SD
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Rome
90.2
Cost Index
Sioux Falls
90.6
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rome, GA and Sioux Falls, SD-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Sioux Falls is 17.3 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Rome corresponds to $100,521 in Sioux Falls.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Rome
90.2
Sioux Falls
90.6
Goods
Rome
96.3
Sioux Falls
95.5
Services
Rome
90.7
Sioux Falls
80.7
Rents
Rome
60.3
Sioux Falls
77.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Rome would need to be in Sioux Falls for the same purchasing power:

In Rome In Sioux Falls Difference
$50,000 $50,261 +$261
$75,000 $75,391 +$391
$100,000 $100,521 +$521
$150,000 $150,782 +$782
$ in Rome = – in Sioux Falls

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Reverse: Sioux Falls → Rome Rome Details Sioux Falls Details

Also Compare

vs Manhattan vs Bowling Green vs Las Cruces vs Lawrence vs Beaumont-Port Arthur vs Gulfport-Biloxi vs Elizabethtown vs Battle Creek

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Sioux Falls more expensive than Rome?

Sioux Falls is 0.5% more expensive than Rome. The overall cost index is 90.6 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Sioux Falls equals $100K in Rome?

A $100,000 salary in Rome has the same purchasing power as $100,521 in Sioux Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Rome and Sioux Falls?

Rents in Rome are indexed at 60.3 while Sioux Falls is at 77.6 (national average = 100). Sioux Falls has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.