Overall
- Rochester
- 97.0
- Longview-Kelso
- 97.5
Diff +0.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Longview-Kelso is 0.5% more expensive than Rochester.
Longview-Kelso, WA is 0.5% more expensive than Rochester, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.5 vs 97.0). A $100,000 salary in Rochester buys about the same as $100,526 in Longview-Kelso; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:WA 97.0→97.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Rochester, NY and Longview-Kelso, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Longview-Kelso is 34.8 points lower. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Rochester to $100,526 in Longview-Kelso, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.5 RPP
Diff +5.3 RPP
Diff -34.8 RPP
Diff -4.9 RPP
| Category | Rochester | Longview-Kelso | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.0 | 97.5 | +0.5 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.0 | +5.3 |
| Services | 133.2 | 98.5 | -34.8 |
| Rents | 87.5 | 82.5 | -4.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Rochester would need to be in Longview-Kelso for the same purchasing power:
| In Rochester | In Longview-Kelso | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,263 | +$263 |
| $75,000 | $75,394 | +$394 |
| $100,000 | $100,526 | +$526 |
| $150,000 | $150,788 | +$788 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.0 → 97.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Longview-Kelso is 0.5% more expensive than Rochester. The overall cost index is 97.5 vs 97.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Rochester has the same purchasing power as $100,526 in Longview-Kelso. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Rochester are indexed at 87.5 while Longview-Kelso is at 82.5 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.