Longview-Kelso vs Rochester

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 0.5% less expensive than Longview-Kelso.

0.5% less expensive

Rochester, NY is 0.5% less expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.0 vs 97.5). A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso buys about the same as $99,477 in Rochester; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 97.5 (Longview-Kelso) vs 97.0 (Rochester)
  • $100k in Longview-Kelso ≈ $99,477 purchasing power in Rochester
  • Services drives the gap (+34.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:NY 97.5→97.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WA × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Longview-Kelso
97.5
Cost Index
Rochester
97.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Longview-Kelso, WA and Rochester, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Rochester is 34.8 points higher. But services and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Longview-Kelso to $99,477 in Rochester, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Longview-Kelso
97.5
Rochester
97.0
Goods
Longview-Kelso
105.0
Rochester
99.7
Services
Longview-Kelso
98.5
Rochester
133.2
Rents
Longview-Kelso
82.5
Rochester
87.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Longview-Kelso would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:

In Longview-Kelso In Rochester Difference
$50,000 $49,739 $-261
$75,000 $74,608 $-392
$100,000 $99,477 $-523
$150,000 $149,216 $-784
$ in Longview-Kelso = in Rochester

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.5 → 97.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Rochester more expensive than Longview-Kelso?

Rochester is 0.5% less expensive than Longview-Kelso. The overall cost index is 97.0 vs 97.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Rochester equals $100K in Longview-Kelso?

A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso has the same purchasing power as $99,477 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Longview-Kelso and Rochester?

Rents in Longview-Kelso are indexed at 82.5 while Rochester is at 87.5 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.