Overall
Diff +7.1 RPP
Racine-Mount Pleasant vs Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 7.4% more expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant.
7.4% more expensive
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX is 7.4% more expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.1 vs 96.0). A $100,000 salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant buys about the same as $107,429 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 96.0 (Racine-Mount Pleasant) vs 103.1 (Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington)
- $100k in Racine-Mount Pleasant ≈ $107,429 purchasing power in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
- Rents drives the gap (+25.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:TX 96.0→103.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE WI × TX
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant would need to be in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for the same purchasing power:
| In Racine-Mount Pleasant | In Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,715 | +$3,715 |
| $75,000 | $80,572 | +$5,572 |
| $100,000 | $107,429 | +$7,429 |
| $150,000 | $161,144 | +$11,144 |
$ in Racine-Mount Pleasant = in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.0 → 103.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX is 7.4% more expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant, WI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is above 100 while Racine-Mount Pleasant is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 25.8 points higher than Racine-Mount Pleasant. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Racine-Mount Pleasant corresponds to $107,429 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +9.1 RPP
Services
Diff +0.7 RPP
Rents
Diff +25.8 RPP
| Category | Racine-Mount Pleasant | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.0 | 103.1 | +7.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 102.8 | +9.1 |
| Services | 90.0 | 90.7 | +0.7 |
| Rents | 92.0 | 117.9 | +25.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Racine-Mount Pleasant 96.0
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 103.1
Goods
Racine-Mount Pleasant 93.8
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 102.8
Services
Racine-Mount Pleasant 90.0
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 90.7
Rents
Racine-Mount Pleasant 92.0
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington 117.9
Vertical line = national average (100)
Racine-Mount Pleasant
96.0
Cost Index
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
103.1
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Racine-Mount Pleasant and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.0 to 7.1 RPP points. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 11.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (14.0 to 25.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Racine-Mount Pleasant RPP | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 96.3 | 101.4 | 5.0 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2012 | 94.4 | 100.8 | 6.3 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2016 | 94.6 | 98.0 | 3.4 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2020 | 93.9 | 104.5 | 10.6 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
| 2024 | 96.0 | 103.1 | 7.1 points Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington more expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant?
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is 7.4% more expensive than Racine-Mount Pleasant. The overall cost index is 103.1 vs 96.0 (national average = 100).
What salary in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington equals $100K in Racine-Mount Pleasant?
A $100,000 salary in Racine-Mount Pleasant has the same purchasing power as $107,429 in Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Racine-Mount Pleasant and Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington?
Rents in Racine-Mount Pleasant are indexed at 92.0 while Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington is at 117.9 (national average = 100). Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.