Providence-Warwick vs Burlington-South Burlington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Burlington-South Burlington is 0.8% less expensive than Providence-Warwick.

0.8% less expensive

Burlington-South Burlington, VT is 0.8% less expensive than Providence-Warwick, RI-MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.9 vs 101.8). A $100,000 salary in Providence-Warwick buys about the same as $99,190 in Burlington-South Burlington; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 101.8 (Providence-Warwick) vs 100.9 (Burlington-South Burlington)
  • $100k in Providence-Warwick ≈ $99,190 purchasing power in Burlington-South Burlington
  • Services drives the gap (-23.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair RI:VT 101.8→100.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE RI × VT
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Providence-Warwick
101.8
Cost Index
Burlington-South Burlington
100.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Providence-Warwick, RI-MA and Burlington-South Burlington, VT are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Burlington-South Burlington is 23.3 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Providence-Warwick to $99,190 in Burlington-South Burlington, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Providence-Warwick
101.8
Burlington-South Burlington
100.9
Goods
Providence-Warwick
97.1
Burlington-South Burlington
97.3
Services
Providence-Warwick
148.8
Burlington-South Burlington
125.5
Rents
Providence-Warwick
103.9
Burlington-South Burlington
103.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Providence-Warwick would need to be in Burlington-South Burlington for the same purchasing power:

In Providence-Warwick In Burlington-South Burlington Difference
$50,000 $49,595 $-405
$75,000 $74,393 $-607
$100,000 $99,190 $-810
$150,000 $148,786 $-1,214
$ in Providence-Warwick = in Burlington-South Burlington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.8 → 100.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Burlington-South Burlington more expensive than Providence-Warwick?

Burlington-South Burlington is 0.8% less expensive than Providence-Warwick. The overall cost index is 100.9 vs 101.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Burlington-South Burlington equals $100K in Providence-Warwick?

A $100,000 salary in Providence-Warwick has the same purchasing power as $99,190 in Burlington-South Burlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Providence-Warwick and Burlington-South Burlington?

Rents in Providence-Warwick are indexed at 103.9 while Burlington-South Burlington is at 103.8 (national average = 100). Providence-Warwick has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.