Overall
- Providence-Warwick
- 101.8
- Ann Arbor
- 100.9
Diff -0.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Ann Arbor is 0.9% less expensive than Providence-Warwick.
Ann Arbor, MI is 0.9% less expensive than Providence-Warwick, RI-MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.9 vs 101.8). A $100,000 salary in Providence-Warwick buys about the same as $99,123 in Ann Arbor; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair RI:MI 101.8→100.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA and Ann Arbor, MI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Ann Arbor is 50.6 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Providence-Warwick to $99,123 in Ann Arbor, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff -3.4 RPP
Diff -50.6 RPP
Diff +21.4 RPP
| Category | Providence-Warwick | Ann Arbor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.8 | 100.9 | -0.9 |
| Goods | 97.1 | 93.7 | -3.4 |
| Services | 148.8 | 98.2 | -50.6 |
| Rents | 103.9 | 125.3 | +21.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Providence-Warwick and Ann Arbor share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.0 to 0.9 RPP points. Providence-Warwick remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (40.7 to 50.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Providence-Warwick RPP | Ann Arbor RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.7 | 103.6 | 0.0 points Providence-Warwick higher |
| 2012 | 100.3 | 100.9 | 0.5 points Ann Arbor higher |
| 2016 | 101.9 | 98.4 | 3.5 points Providence-Warwick higher |
| 2020 | 101.7 | 98.6 | 3.1 points Providence-Warwick higher |
| 2024 | 101.8 | 100.9 | 0.9 points Providence-Warwick higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Providence-Warwick would need to be in Ann Arbor for the same purchasing power:
| In Providence-Warwick | In Ann Arbor | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,561 | $-439 |
| $75,000 | $74,342 | $-658 |
| $100,000 | $99,123 | $-877 |
| $150,000 | $148,684 | $-1,316 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.8 → 100.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ann Arbor is 0.9% less expensive than Providence-Warwick. The overall cost index is 100.9 vs 101.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Providence-Warwick has the same purchasing power as $99,123 in Ann Arbor. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Providence-Warwick are indexed at 103.9 while Ann Arbor is at 125.3 (national average = 100). Ann Arbor has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.