Pittsfield vs Grand Junction

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Grand Junction is 0.4% more expensive than Pittsfield.

0.4% more expensive

Grand Junction, CO is 0.4% more expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $100,389 in Grand Junction; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 95.1 (Pittsfield) vs 95.5 (Grand Junction)
  • $100k in Pittsfield ≈ $100,389 purchasing power in Grand Junction
  • Services drives the gap (-70.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MA:CO 95.1→95.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MA × CO
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Pittsfield
95.1
Cost Index
Grand Junction
95.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Pittsfield, MA and Grand Junction, CO are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Grand Junction is 70.4 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $100,389 in Grand Junction, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Pittsfield
95.1
Grand Junction
95.5
Goods
Pittsfield
97.0
Grand Junction
96.1
Services
Pittsfield
153.7
Grand Junction
83.3
Rents
Pittsfield
73.5
Grand Junction
86.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Grand Junction for the same purchasing power:

In Pittsfield In Grand Junction Difference
$50,000 $50,195 +$195
$75,000 $75,292 +$292
$100,000 $100,389 +$389
$150,000 $150,584 +$584
$ in Pittsfield = in Grand Junction

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Grand Junction more expensive than Pittsfield?

Grand Junction is 0.4% more expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Grand Junction equals $100K in Pittsfield?

A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $100,389 in Grand Junction. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Pittsfield and Grand Junction?

Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Grand Junction is at 86.4 (national average = 100). Grand Junction has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.