Overall
- Pittsfield
- 95.1
- Gettysburg
- 95.4
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Gettysburg is 0.3% more expensive than Pittsfield.
Gettysburg, PA is 0.3% more expensive than Pittsfield, MA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.4 vs 95.1). A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield buys about the same as $100,287 in Gettysburg; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MA:PA 95.1→95.4
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Pittsfield, MA and Gettysburg, PA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Gettysburg is 46.7 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsfield to $100,287 in Gettysburg, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +3.7 RPP
Diff -46.7 RPP
Diff +0.4 RPP
| Category | Pittsfield | Gettysburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.1 | 95.4 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 97.0 | 100.7 | +3.7 |
| Services | 153.7 | 107.0 | -46.7 |
| Rents | 73.5 | 73.9 | +0.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Pittsfield would need to be in Gettysburg for the same purchasing power:
| In Pittsfield | In Gettysburg | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,144 | +$144 |
| $75,000 | $75,215 | +$215 |
| $100,000 | $100,287 | +$287 |
| $150,000 | $150,431 | +$431 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (95.1 → 95.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Gettysburg is 0.3% more expensive than Pittsfield. The overall cost index is 95.4 vs 95.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pittsfield has the same purchasing power as $100,287 in Gettysburg. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pittsfield are indexed at 73.5 while Gettysburg is at 73.9 (national average = 100). Gettysburg has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.