Overall
- Pittsburgh
- 94.7
- Lewiston-Auburn
- 94.7
Diff +0.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lewiston-Auburn is 0.1% more expensive than Pittsburgh.
Lewiston-Auburn, ME is 0.1% more expensive than Pittsburgh, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.7). A $100,000 salary in Pittsburgh buys about the same as $100,069 in Lewiston-Auburn; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:ME 94.7→94.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Pittsburgh, PA and Lewiston-Auburn, ME are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Lewiston-Auburn is 26.7 points higher. But goods and rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Pittsburgh to $100,069 in Lewiston-Auburn, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -3.5 RPP
Diff +26.7 RPP
Diff -3.0 RPP
| Category | Pittsburgh | Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.7 | 94.7 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 97.2 | -3.5 |
| Services | 107.7 | 134.4 | +26.7 |
| Rents | 72.0 | 69.0 | -3.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Pittsburgh and Lewiston-Auburn share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.3 to 0.1 RPP points. Lewiston-Auburn remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 10.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.1 to 3.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Pittsburgh RPP | Lewiston-Auburn RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 92.4 | 97.7 | 5.3 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2012 | 95.5 | 98.8 | 3.2 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2016 | 93.9 | 96.6 | 2.6 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2020 | 95.5 | 99.7 | 4.2 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
| 2024 | 94.7 | 94.7 | 0.1 points Lewiston-Auburn higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Pittsburgh would need to be in Lewiston-Auburn for the same purchasing power:
| In Pittsburgh | In Lewiston-Auburn | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,034 | +$34 |
| $75,000 | $75,051 | +$51 |
| $100,000 | $100,069 | +$69 |
| $150,000 | $150,103 | +$103 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.7 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lewiston-Auburn is 0.1% more expensive than Pittsburgh. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pittsburgh has the same purchasing power as $100,069 in Lewiston-Auburn. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pittsburgh are indexed at 72.0 while Lewiston-Auburn is at 69.0 (national average = 100). Pittsburgh has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.