Overall
- Sumter
- 88.0
Diff -0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sumter is 0.4% less expensive than Pinehurst-Southern Pines.
Sumter, SC is 0.4% less expensive than Pinehurst-Southern Pines, NC on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.0 vs 88.3). A $100,000 salary in Pinehurst-Southern Pines buys about the same as $99,642 in Sumter; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NC:SC 88.3→88.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Pinehurst-Southern Pines, NC and Sumter, SC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Sumter is 1.5 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Pinehurst-Southern Pines corresponds to $99,642 in Sumter.
Diff -0.3 RPP
Diff -0.3 RPP
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff +1.5 RPP
| Category | Pinehurst-Southern Pines | Sumter | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.3 | 88.0 | -0.3 |
| Goods | 96.6 | 96.3 | -0.3 |
| Services | 88.2 | 87.3 | -0.9 |
| Rents | 59.3 | 60.8 | +1.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Pinehurst-Southern Pines and Sumter share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.1 to 0.3 RPP points. Pinehurst-Southern Pines remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.5 to 0.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Pinehurst-Southern Pines RPP | Sumter RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 86.3 | 89.4 | 3.1 points Sumter higher |
| 2012 | 86.9 | 89.6 | 2.7 points Sumter higher |
| 2016 | 88.4 | 87.1 | 1.3 points Pinehurst-Southern Pines higher |
| 2020 | 88.9 | 81.4 | 7.6 points Pinehurst-Southern Pines higher |
| 2024 | 88.3 | 88.0 | 0.3 points Pinehurst-Southern Pines higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Pinehurst-Southern Pines would need to be in Sumter for the same purchasing power:
| In Pinehurst-Southern Pines | In Sumter | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,821 | $-179 |
| $75,000 | $74,732 | $-268 |
| $100,000 | $99,642 | $-358 |
| $150,000 | $149,463 | $-537 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.3 → 88.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sumter is 0.4% less expensive than Pinehurst-Southern Pines. The overall cost index is 88.0 vs 88.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Pinehurst-Southern Pines has the same purchasing power as $99,642 in Sumter. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Pinehurst-Southern Pines are indexed at 59.3 while Sumter is at 60.8 (national average = 100). Sumter has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.