Overall
- Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
- 103.3
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +0.4 RPP
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler.
0.3% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler buys about the same as $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is goods.
- Overall RPP 103.3 (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler ≈ $100,343 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Goods drives the gap (+10.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WA 103.3→103.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE AZ × WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
103.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Goods creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 10.0 points higher. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, then replace the national basket with your own.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff +10.0 RPP
Services
Diff -1.6 RPP
Rents
- Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
- 121.2
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff -4.6 RPP
| Category | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 103.7 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 95.0 | 105.0 | +10.0 |
| Services | 93.3 | 91.7 | -1.6 |
| Rents | 121.2 | 116.7 | -4.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler 103.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler 95.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler 93.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler 121.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
How the Price Gap Changed
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 0.3 to 0.4 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (19.3 to 1.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.7 | 105.4 | 0.3 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2012 | 98.7 | 101.3 | 2.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 106.0 | 5.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 102.8 | 101.9 | 0.9 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2024 | 103.3 | 103.7 | 0.4 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,171 | +$171 |
| $75,000 | $75,257 | +$257 |
| $100,000 | $100,343 | +$343 |
| $150,000 | $150,514 | +$514 |
$ in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler?
A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has the same purchasing power as $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler are indexed at 121.2 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.