Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler.

0.3% more expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler buys about the same as $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 103.3 (Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler ≈ $100,343 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Goods drives the gap (+10.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:WA 103.3→103.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
103.3
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Goods creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 10.0 points higher. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, then replace the national basket with your own.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
103.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
95.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
93.3
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
121.2
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $50,171 +$171
$75,000 $75,257 +$257
$100,000 $100,343 +$343
$150,000 $150,514 +$514
$ in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 0.3% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler?

A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has the same purchasing power as $100,343 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler are indexed at 121.2 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.