Overall
- Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
- 103.3
- Ithaca
- 103.3
Diff +0.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Ithaca is 0% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler.
Ithaca, NY is 0% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.3 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler buys about the same as $100,001 in Ithaca; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:NY 103.3→103.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ and Ithaca, NY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Ithaca 38.3 points higher than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler to $100,001 in Ithaca, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.0 RPP
Diff +4.7 RPP
Diff +38.3 RPP
Diff +7.1 RPP
| Category | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 103.3 | +0.0 |
| Goods | 95.0 | 99.7 | +4.7 |
| Services | 93.3 | 131.6 | +38.3 |
| Rents | 121.2 | 128.4 | +7.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Ithaca share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.5 to 0.0 RPP points. Ithaca remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 30.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (23.0 to 7.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler RPP | Ithaca RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.7 | 100.2 | 5.5 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2012 | 98.7 | 101.9 | 3.2 points Ithaca higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 102.0 | 1.6 points Ithaca higher |
| 2020 | 102.8 | 101.3 | 1.4 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2024 | 103.3 | 103.3 | 0.0 points Ithaca higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler would need to be in Ithaca for the same purchasing power:
| In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | In Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,000 | $0 |
| $75,000 | $75,001 | +$1 |
| $100,000 | $100,001 | +$1 |
| $150,000 | $150,001 | +$1 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 103.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Ithaca is 0% more expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. The overall cost index is 103.3 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has the same purchasing power as $100,001 in Ithaca. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler are indexed at 121.2 while Ithaca is at 128.4 (national average = 100). Ithaca has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.