Overall
- Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler
- 103.3
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
Diff -3.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kennewick-Richland is 3.1% less expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler.
Kennewick-Richland, WA is 3.1% less expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.1 vs 103.3). A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler buys about the same as $96,867 in Kennewick-Richland; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WA 103.3→100.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -3.2 RPP
Diff +10.0 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -26.4 RPP
| Category | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | Kennewick-Richland | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.3 | 100.1 | -3.2 |
| Goods | 95.0 | 105.0 | +10.0 |
| Services | 93.3 | 93.6 | +0.2 |
| Rents | 121.2 | 94.8 | -26.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Kennewick-Richland is 26.4 points lower. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Kennewick-Richland, WA is 3.1% less expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.2-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler corresponds to $96,867 in Kennewick-Richland.
What a salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler would need to be in Kennewick-Richland for the same purchasing power:
| In Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler | In Kennewick-Richland | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,433 | $-1,567 |
| $75,000 | $72,650 | $-2,350 |
| $100,000 | $96,867 | $-3,133 |
| $150,000 | $145,300 | $-4,700 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.3 → 100.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler and Kennewick-Richland share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 11.5 to 3.2 RPP points. Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (28.1 to 0.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler RPP | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.7 | 94.2 | 11.5 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2012 | 98.7 | 99.3 | 0.6 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2016 | 100.4 | 97.4 | 3.1 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2020 | 102.8 | 99.8 | 3.0 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
| 2024 | 103.3 | 100.1 | 3.2 points Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Kennewick-Richland is 3.1% less expensive than Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler. The overall cost index is 100.1 vs 103.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has the same purchasing power as $96,867 in Kennewick-Richland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler are indexed at 121.2 while Kennewick-Richland is at 94.8 (national average = 100). Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.