Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington vs Medford

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Medford is 1.1% less expensive than Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington.

1.1% less expensive

Medford, OR is 1.1% less expensive than Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.4 vs 102.6). A $100,000 salary in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington buys about the same as $98,907 in Medford; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 102.6 (Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington) vs 101.4 (Medford)
  • $100k in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington ≈ $98,907 purchasing power in Medford
  • Rents drives the gap (-15.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair PA:OR 102.6→101.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE PA × OR
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
102.6
Cost Index
Medford
101.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD and Medford, OR are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Medford is 15.5 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington corresponds to $98,907 in Medford.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
102.6
Medford
101.4
Goods
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
96.8
Medford
105.3
Services
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
114.4
Medford
102.3
Rents
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
113.1
Medford
97.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington would need to be in Medford for the same purchasing power:

In Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington In Medford Difference
$50,000 $49,453 $-547
$75,000 $74,180 $-820
$100,000 $98,907 $-1,093
$150,000 $148,360 $-1,640
$ in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington = in Medford

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.6 → 101.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Medford more expensive than Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington?

Medford is 1.1% less expensive than Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. The overall cost index is 101.4 vs 102.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Medford equals $100K in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington?

A $100,000 salary in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington has the same purchasing power as $98,907 in Medford. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington and Medford?

Rents in Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington are indexed at 113.1 while Medford is at 97.7 (national average = 100). Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.