Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff -15.3 RPP
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater vs Pinehurst-Southern Pines
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Pinehurst-Southern Pines is 14.8% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
14.8% less expensive
Pinehurst-Southern Pines, NC is 14.8% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 88.3 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $85,209 in Pinehurst-Southern Pines; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater) vs 88.3 (Pinehurst-Southern Pines)
- $100k in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater ≈ $85,209 purchasing power in Pinehurst-Southern Pines
- Rents drives the gap (-57.4 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:NC 103.7→88.3
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE WA × NC
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Pinehurst-Southern Pines for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Pinehurst-Southern Pines | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $42,604 | $-7,396 |
| $75,000 | $63,907 | $-11,093 |
| $100,000 | $85,209 | $-14,791 |
| $150,000 | $127,813 | $-22,187 |
$ in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater = in Pinehurst-Southern Pines
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 88.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA and Pinehurst-Southern Pines, NC sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 15.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Pinehurst-Southern Pines is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Pinehurst-Southern Pines 57.4 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $85,209 in Pinehurst-Southern Pines.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff -8.4 RPP
Services
Diff -3.5 RPP
Rents
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff -57.4 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Pinehurst-Southern Pines | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 88.3 | -15.3 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.6 | -8.4 |
| Services | 91.7 | 88.2 | -3.5 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 59.3 | -57.4 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Pinehurst-Southern Pines 88.3
Goods
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Pinehurst-Southern Pines 96.6
Services
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Pinehurst-Southern Pines 88.2
Rents
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Pinehurst-Southern Pines 59.3
Vertical line = national average (100)
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Pinehurst-Southern Pines
88.3
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Pinehurst-Southern Pines share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 19.0 to 15.3 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 6.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (50.5 to 57.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Pinehurst-Southern Pines RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.4 | 86.3 | 19.0 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 101.3 | 86.9 | 14.4 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 106.0 | 88.4 | 17.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 101.9 | 88.9 | 12.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 103.7 | 88.3 | 15.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pinehurst-Southern Pines more expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Pinehurst-Southern Pines is 14.8% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 88.3 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Pinehurst-Southern Pines equals $100K in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $85,209 in Pinehurst-Southern Pines. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Pinehurst-Southern Pines?
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Pinehurst-Southern Pines is at 59.3 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.