Overall
- Oklahoma City
- 90.4
- Rochester
- 90.8
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 0.5% more expensive than Oklahoma City.
Rochester, MN is 0.5% more expensive than Oklahoma City, OK on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 90.4). A $100,000 salary in Oklahoma City buys about the same as $100,457 in Rochester; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair OK:MN 90.4→90.8
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Oklahoma City, OK and Rochester, MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services leads the difference, with Rochester 13.3 points higher than Oklahoma City. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Oklahoma City to $100,457 in Rochester, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +1.7 RPP
Diff +13.3 RPP
Diff +4.7 RPP
| Category | Oklahoma City | Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.4 | 90.8 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 95.4 | +1.7 |
| Services | 74.1 | 87.4 | +13.3 |
| Rents | 73.9 | 78.6 | +4.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Oklahoma City would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:
| In Oklahoma City | In Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,228 | +$228 |
| $75,000 | $75,343 | +$343 |
| $100,000 | $100,457 | +$457 |
| $150,000 | $150,685 | +$685 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.4 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rochester is 0.5% more expensive than Oklahoma City. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 90.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Oklahoma City has the same purchasing power as $100,457 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Oklahoma City are indexed at 73.9 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Rochester has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.