Mount Vernon-Anacortes vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 3.7% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes.

3.7% less expensive

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX is 3.7% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.6 vs 102.4). A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes buys about the same as $96,277 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands; the largest component gap is goods.

  • Overall RPP 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes) vs 98.6 (Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands)
  • $100k in Mount Vernon-Anacortes ≈ $96,277 purchasing power in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
  • Goods drives the gap (-4.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:TX 102.4→98.6

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · GOODS-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WA × TX
  • GOODS-LED Goods-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX is 3.7% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.8-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Mount Vernon-Anacortes is above 100 while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Goods leads the difference, with Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands 4.4 points lower than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a goods-led difference, remember that many tradable prices vary less by address than housing or labor-priced services. Use $96,277 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands as the BEA equivalent of $100,000 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes, then replace the national basket with your own.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes would need to be in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands for the same purchasing power:

In Mount Vernon-Anacortes In Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands Difference
$50,000 $48,138 $-1,862
$75,000 $72,208 $-2,792
$100,000 $96,277 $-3,723
$150,000 $144,415 $-5,585
$ in Mount Vernon-Anacortes = in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.4 → 98.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Goods
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
100.6
Services
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
95.3
Rents
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
104.5

Vertical line = national average (100)

Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands
98.6
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is 3.7% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. The overall cost index is 98.6 vs 102.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands equals $100K in Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes has the same purchasing power as $96,277 in Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Mount Vernon-Anacortes and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands?

Rents in Mount Vernon-Anacortes are indexed at 108.2 while Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands is at 104.5 (national average = 100). Mount Vernon-Anacortes has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.