Mount Vernon-Anacortes vs Fort Collins-Loveland

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fort Collins-Loveland is 1.3% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes.

1.3% less expensive

Fort Collins-Loveland, CO is 1.3% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.1 vs 102.4). A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes buys about the same as $98,716 in Fort Collins-Loveland; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes) vs 101.1 (Fort Collins-Loveland)
  • $100k in Mount Vernon-Anacortes ≈ $98,716 purchasing power in Fort Collins-Loveland
  • Services drives the gap (-13.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:CO 102.4→101.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WA × CO
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index
Fort Collins-Loveland
101.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA and Fort Collins-Loveland, CO are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Fort Collins-Loveland is 13.9 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes to $98,716 in Fort Collins-Loveland, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Fort Collins-Loveland
101.1
Goods
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Fort Collins-Loveland
96.1
Services
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Fort Collins-Loveland
82.2
Rents
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2
Fort Collins-Loveland
120.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes would need to be in Fort Collins-Loveland for the same purchasing power:

In Mount Vernon-Anacortes In Fort Collins-Loveland Difference
$50,000 $49,358 $-642
$75,000 $74,037 $-963
$100,000 $98,716 $-1,284
$150,000 $148,075 $-1,925
$ in Mount Vernon-Anacortes = in Fort Collins-Loveland

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.4 → 101.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fort Collins-Loveland more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Fort Collins-Loveland is 1.3% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. The overall cost index is 101.1 vs 102.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Fort Collins-Loveland equals $100K in Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes has the same purchasing power as $98,716 in Fort Collins-Loveland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Mount Vernon-Anacortes and Fort Collins-Loveland?

Rents in Mount Vernon-Anacortes are indexed at 108.2 while Fort Collins-Loveland is at 120.6 (national average = 100). Fort Collins-Loveland has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.