Fort Collins-Loveland vs Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 1.3% more expensive than Fort Collins-Loveland.

1.3% more expensive

Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA is 1.3% more expensive than Fort Collins-Loveland, CO on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.4 vs 101.1). A $100,000 salary in Fort Collins-Loveland buys about the same as $101,300 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 101.1 (Fort Collins-Loveland) vs 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes)
  • $100k in Fort Collins-Loveland ≈ $101,300 purchasing power in Mount Vernon-Anacortes
  • Services drives the gap (+13.9 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CO:WA 101.1→102.4

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE CO × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Fort Collins-Loveland
101.1
Cost Index
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Fort Collins-Loveland, CO and Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 13.9 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Fort Collins-Loveland to $101,300 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Fort Collins-Loveland
101.1
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Goods
Fort Collins-Loveland
96.1
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Services
Fort Collins-Loveland
82.2
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Rents
Fort Collins-Loveland
120.6
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Fort Collins-Loveland would need to be in Mount Vernon-Anacortes for the same purchasing power:

In Fort Collins-Loveland In Mount Vernon-Anacortes Difference
$50,000 $50,650 +$650
$75,000 $75,975 +$975
$100,000 $101,300 +$1,300
$150,000 $151,950 +$1,950
$ in Fort Collins-Loveland = in Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.1 → 102.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mount Vernon-Anacortes more expensive than Fort Collins-Loveland?

Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 1.3% more expensive than Fort Collins-Loveland. The overall cost index is 102.4 vs 101.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes equals $100K in Fort Collins-Loveland?

A $100,000 salary in Fort Collins-Loveland has the same purchasing power as $101,300 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Fort Collins-Loveland and Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Rents in Fort Collins-Loveland are indexed at 120.6 while Mount Vernon-Anacortes is at 108.2 (national average = 100). Fort Collins-Loveland has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.