Missoula vs Yakima

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yakima is 0.9% less expensive than Missoula.

0.9% less expensive

Yakima, WA is 0.9% less expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $99,067 in Yakima; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 96.4 (Missoula) vs 95.5 (Yakima)
  • $100k in Missoula ≈ $99,067 purchasing power in Yakima
  • Rents drives the gap (-22.3 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MT:WA 96.4→95.5

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MT × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Missoula
96.4
Cost Index
Yakima
95.5
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Missoula, MT and Yakima, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.9 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Yakima is 22.3 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Missoula corresponds to $99,067 in Yakima.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Missoula
96.4
Yakima
95.5
Goods
Missoula
96.0
Yakima
105.0
Services
Missoula
72.1
Yakima
91.9
Rents
Missoula
94.9
Yakima
72.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

How the Price Gap Changed

Missoula and Yakima share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.0 to 0.9 RPP points. Missoula remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (2.6 to 19.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Missoula RPP Yakima RPP Relative Gap
2008 98.0 93.0 5.0 points Missoula higher
2012 93.9 97.1 3.2 points Yakima higher
2016 95.8 94.4 1.4 points Missoula higher
2020 93.9 96.2 2.3 points Yakima higher
2024 96.4 95.5 0.9 points Missoula higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Yakima for the same purchasing power:

In Missoula In Yakima Difference
$50,000 $49,533 $-467
$75,000 $74,300 $-700
$100,000 $99,067 $-933
$150,000 $148,600 $-1,400
$ in Missoula = in Yakima

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Yakima more expensive than Missoula?

Yakima is 0.9% less expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Yakima equals $100K in Missoula?

A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $99,067 in Yakima. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Missoula and Yakima?

Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Yakima is at 72.6 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.