Overall
- Missoula
- 96.4
- Springfield
- 96.1
Diff -0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Springfield is 0.4% less expensive than Missoula.
Springfield, MA is 0.4% less expensive than Missoula, MT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.1 vs 96.4). A $100,000 salary in Missoula buys about the same as $99,602 in Springfield; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MT:MA 96.4→96.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Missoula, MT and Springfield, MA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Springfield is 82.9 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Missoula to $99,602 in Springfield, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.4 RPP
Diff +1.0 RPP
Diff +82.9 RPP
Diff -19.2 RPP
| Category | Missoula | Springfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.4 | 96.1 | -0.4 |
| Goods | 96.0 | 97.0 | +1.0 |
| Services | 72.1 | 155.0 | +82.9 |
| Rents | 94.9 | 75.8 | -19.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Missoula would need to be in Springfield for the same purchasing power:
| In Missoula | In Springfield | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,801 | $-199 |
| $75,000 | $74,701 | $-299 |
| $100,000 | $99,602 | $-398 |
| $150,000 | $149,403 | $-597 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (96.4 → 96.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Springfield is 0.4% less expensive than Missoula. The overall cost index is 96.1 vs 96.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Missoula has the same purchasing power as $99,602 in Springfield. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Missoula are indexed at 94.9 while Springfield is at 75.8 (national average = 100). Missoula has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.