Overall
- Santa Fe
- 98.8
Diff -6.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Santa Fe is 5.8% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington.
Santa Fe, NM is 5.8% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.8 vs 104.8). A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington buys about the same as $94,224 in Santa Fe; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair MN:NM 104.8→98.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Santa Fe, NM is 5.8% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington is above 100 while Santa Fe is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Santa Fe 16.8 points lower than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington to $94,224 in Santa Fe, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington and Santa Fe share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.9 to 6.1 RPP points. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 15.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (1.5 to 16.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington RPP | Santa Fe RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 102.9 | 98.0 | 4.9 points Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington higher |
| 2012 | 101.2 | 102.1 | 0.9 points Santa Fe higher |
| 2016 | 102.3 | 98.4 | 3.9 points Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington higher |
| 2020 | 102.4 | 96.6 | 5.8 points Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington higher |
| 2024 | 104.8 | 98.8 | 6.1 points Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -6.1 RPP
Diff -6.9 RPP
Diff -16.8 RPP
Diff -3.9 RPP
| Category | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | Santa Fe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 104.8 | 98.8 | -6.1 |
| Goods | 103.1 | 96.1 | -6.9 |
| Services | 93.5 | 76.7 | -16.8 |
| Rents | 111.8 | 108.0 | -3.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington would need to be in Santa Fe for the same purchasing power:
| In Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington | In Santa Fe | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,112 | $-2,888 |
| $75,000 | $70,668 | $-4,332 |
| $100,000 | $94,224 | $-5,776 |
| $150,000 | $141,335 | $-8,665 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (104.8 → 98.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Santa Fe is 5.8% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. The overall cost index is 98.8 vs 104.8 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington has the same purchasing power as $94,224 in Santa Fe. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington are indexed at 111.8 while Santa Fe is at 108.0 (national average = 100). Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.