Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 1.1% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington.

1.1% less expensive

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 1.1% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 104.8). A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington buys about the same as $98,901 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 104.8 (Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
  • $100k in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington ≈ $98,901 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
  • Rents drives the gap (+4.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MN:WA 104.8→103.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MN × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
104.8
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 4.8 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington corresponds to $98,901 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
104.8
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Goods
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
103.1
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Services
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
93.5
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Rents
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington
111.8
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:

In Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater Difference
$50,000 $49,450 $-550
$75,000 $74,176 $-824
$100,000 $98,901 $-1,099
$150,000 $148,351 $-1,649
$ in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (104.8 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington?

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 1.1% less expensive than Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 104.8 (national average = 100).

What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington?

A $100,000 salary in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington has the same purchasing power as $98,901 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Rents in Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington are indexed at 111.8 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.