Overall
Diff -7.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Rochester is 7.6% less expensive than Merced.
Rochester, MN is 7.6% less expensive than Merced, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.8 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Merced buys about the same as $92,415 in Rochester; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:MN 98.3→90.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Rochester, MN is 7.6% less expensive than Merced, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.5-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Rochester 70.9 points lower than Merced. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Merced to $92,415 in Rochester, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Merced and Rochester share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.9 to 7.5 RPP points. Merced remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 53.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (17.1 to 70.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Merced RPP | Rochester RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.3 | 95.2 | 0.9 points Rochester higher |
| 2012 | 98.6 | 94.5 | 4.1 points Merced higher |
| 2016 | 95.3 | 92.8 | 2.5 points Merced higher |
| 2020 | 98.7 | 96.7 | 2.1 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 90.8 | 7.5 points Merced higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -7.5 RPP
Diff -9.7 RPP
Diff -70.9 RPP
Diff -0.0 RPP
| Category | Merced | Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 90.8 | -7.5 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 95.4 | -9.7 |
| Services | 158.3 | 87.4 | -70.9 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 78.6 | -0.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Merced would need to be in Rochester for the same purchasing power:
| In Merced | In Rochester | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,208 | $-3,792 |
| $75,000 | $69,311 | $-5,689 |
| $100,000 | $92,415 | $-7,585 |
| $150,000 | $138,623 | $-11,377 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 90.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Rochester is 7.6% less expensive than Merced. The overall cost index is 90.8 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Merced has the same purchasing power as $92,415 in Rochester. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Merced are indexed at 78.6 while Rochester is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Merced has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.