Overall
Diff -3.2 RPP
Medford vs Lancaster
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 3.1% less expensive than Medford.
3.1% less expensive
Lancaster, PA is 3.1% less expensive than Medford, OR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 101.4). A $100,000 salary in Medford buys about the same as $96,869 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 101.4 (Medford) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
- $100k in Medford ≈ $96,869 purchasing power in Lancaster
- Services drives the gap (+5.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair OR:PA 101.4→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE OR × PA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -4.6 RPP
Services
Diff +5.0 RPP
Rents
Diff -3.8 RPP
| Category | Medford | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.4 | 98.3 | -3.2 |
| Goods | 105.3 | 100.7 | -4.6 |
| Services | 102.3 | 107.3 | +5.0 |
| Rents | 97.7 | 93.8 | -3.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Medford 101.4
Lancaster 98.3
Goods
Medford 105.3
Lancaster 100.7
Services
Medford 102.3
Lancaster 107.3
Rents
Medford 97.7
Lancaster 93.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 5.0 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lancaster, PA is 3.1% less expensive than Medford, OR, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 3.2-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Medford is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Medford to $96,869 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Medford
101.4
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Medford would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Medford | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,434 | $-1,566 |
| $75,000 | $72,652 | $-2,348 |
| $100,000 | $96,869 | $-3,131 |
| $150,000 | $145,303 | $-4,697 |
$ in Medford = in Lancaster
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster more expensive than Medford?
Lancaster is 3.1% less expensive than Medford. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 101.4 (national average = 100).
What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Medford?
A $100,000 salary in Medford has the same purchasing power as $96,869 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Medford and Lancaster?
Rents in Medford are indexed at 97.7 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Medford has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.