Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim vs Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 9.8% less expensive than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim.

9.8% less expensive

Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA is 9.8% less expensive than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.4 vs 113.6). A $100,000 salary in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim buys about the same as $90,206 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 113.6 (Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim) vs 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes)
  • $100k in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim ≈ $90,206 purchasing power in Mount Vernon-Anacortes
  • Services drives the gap (-62.6 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:WA 113.6→102.4

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE CA × WA
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA and Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 11.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

Services leads the difference, with Mount Vernon-Anacortes 62.6 points lower than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim to $90,206 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
113.6
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Goods
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
106.6
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Services
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
158.6
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Rents
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
170.4
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim would need to be in Mount Vernon-Anacortes for the same purchasing power:

In Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim In Mount Vernon-Anacortes Difference
$50,000 $45,103 $-4,897
$75,000 $67,654 $-7,346
$100,000 $90,206 $-9,794
$150,000 $135,309 $-14,691
$ in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim = in Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (113.6 → 102.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
113.6
Cost Index
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mount Vernon-Anacortes more expensive than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim?

Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 9.8% less expensive than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim. The overall cost index is 102.4 vs 113.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes equals $100K in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim?

A $100,000 salary in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim has the same purchasing power as $90,206 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim and Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Rents in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim are indexed at 170.4 while Mount Vernon-Anacortes is at 108.2 (national average = 100). Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.