Overall
- Lexington-Fayette
- 92.9
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +5.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 5.8% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette.
Lancaster, PA is 5.8% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette, KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Lexington-Fayette buys about the same as $105,779 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair KY:PA 92.9→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 5.8% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette, KY, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.4-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 32.7 points higher than Lexington-Fayette. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lexington-Fayette to $105,779 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Lexington-Fayette and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 5.2 to 5.4 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (10.8 to 16.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lexington-Fayette RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 95.0 | 100.2 | 5.2 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 96.2 | 97.8 | 1.6 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 99.4 | 4.2 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 91.6 | 97.9 | 6.3 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 92.9 | 98.3 | 5.4 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +5.4 RPP
Diff +4.4 RPP
Diff +32.7 RPP
Diff +16.7 RPP
| Category | Lexington-Fayette | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 92.9 | 98.3 | +5.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 100.7 | +4.4 |
| Services | 74.6 | 107.3 | +32.7 |
| Rents | 77.1 | 93.8 | +16.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Lexington-Fayette would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Lexington-Fayette | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,889 | +$2,889 |
| $75,000 | $79,334 | +$4,334 |
| $100,000 | $105,779 | +$5,779 |
| $150,000 | $158,668 | +$8,668 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 5.8% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lexington-Fayette has the same purchasing power as $105,779 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lexington-Fayette are indexed at 77.1 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.