Lexington-Fayette vs Oshkosh-Neenah

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Oshkosh-Neenah is 0% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette.

0% more expensive

Oshkosh-Neenah, WI is 0% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette, KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.9 vs 92.9). A $100,000 salary in Lexington-Fayette buys about the same as $100,043 in Oshkosh-Neenah; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.9 (Lexington-Fayette) vs 92.9 (Oshkosh-Neenah)
  • $100k in Lexington-Fayette ≈ $100,043 purchasing power in Oshkosh-Neenah
  • Services drives the gap (+16.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair KY:WI 92.9→92.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE KY × WI
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Lexington-Fayette
92.9
Cost Index
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Lexington-Fayette, KY and Oshkosh-Neenah, WI are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Oshkosh-Neenah is 16.0 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lexington-Fayette to $100,043 in Oshkosh-Neenah, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lexington-Fayette
92.9
Oshkosh-Neenah
92.9
Goods
Lexington-Fayette
96.2
Oshkosh-Neenah
93.8
Services
Lexington-Fayette
74.6
Oshkosh-Neenah
90.6
Rents
Lexington-Fayette
77.1
Oshkosh-Neenah
74.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lexington-Fayette would need to be in Oshkosh-Neenah for the same purchasing power:

In Lexington-Fayette In Oshkosh-Neenah Difference
$50,000 $50,022 +$22
$75,000 $75,032 +$32
$100,000 $100,043 +$43
$150,000 $150,065 +$65
$ in Lexington-Fayette = in Oshkosh-Neenah

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.9 → 92.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Oshkosh-Neenah more expensive than Lexington-Fayette?

Oshkosh-Neenah is 0% more expensive than Lexington-Fayette. The overall cost index is 92.9 vs 92.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Oshkosh-Neenah equals $100K in Lexington-Fayette?

A $100,000 salary in Lexington-Fayette has the same purchasing power as $100,043 in Oshkosh-Neenah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lexington-Fayette and Oshkosh-Neenah?

Rents in Lexington-Fayette are indexed at 77.1 while Oshkosh-Neenah is at 74.4 (national average = 100). Lexington-Fayette has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.