Lancaster vs Utica-Rome

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Utica-Rome is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster.

5.7% less expensive

Utica-Rome, NY is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $94,322 in Utica-Rome; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 98.3 (Lancaster) vs 92.7 (Utica-Rome)
  • $100k in Lancaster ≈ $94,322 purchasing power in Utica-Rome
  • Rents drives the gap (-27.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair PA:NY 98.3→92.7

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE PA × NY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lancaster
98.3
Utica-Rome
92.7
Goods
Lancaster
100.7
Utica-Rome
99.7
Services
Lancaster
107.3
Utica-Rome
131.9
Rents
Lancaster
93.8
Utica-Rome
66.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Utica-Rome is 27.8 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Utica-Rome, NY is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lancaster corresponds to $94,322 in Utica-Rome.

Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Utica-Rome
92.7
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Utica-Rome for the same purchasing power:

In Lancaster In Utica-Rome Difference
$50,000 $47,161 $-2,839
$75,000 $70,742 $-4,258
$100,000 $94,322 $-5,678
$150,000 $141,483 $-8,517
$ in Lancaster = in Utica-Rome

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Lancaster and Utica-Rome share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.4 to 5.6 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.3 points between the first and latest shared releases (33.9 to 24.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Lancaster RPP Utica-Rome RPP Relative Gap
2008 100.2 95.7 4.4 points Lancaster higher
2012 97.8 93.5 4.3 points Lancaster higher
2016 99.4 95.3 4.1 points Lancaster higher
2020 97.9 93.4 4.5 points Lancaster higher
2024 98.3 92.7 5.6 points Lancaster higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Utica-Rome more expensive than Lancaster?

Utica-Rome is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Utica-Rome equals $100K in Lancaster?

A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $94,322 in Utica-Rome. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lancaster and Utica-Rome?

Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Utica-Rome is at 66.1 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.