Lancaster vs Minot

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Minot is 11.4% less expensive than Lancaster.

11.4% less expensive

Minot, ND is 11.4% less expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.0 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $88,572 in Minot; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 98.3 (Lancaster) vs 87.0 (Minot)
  • $100k in Lancaster ≈ $88,572 purchasing power in Minot
  • Services drives the gap (-34.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair PA:ND 98.3→87.0

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE PA × ND
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Lancaster, PA and Minot, ND sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 11.2 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

Services leads the difference, with Minot 34.4 points lower than Lancaster. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lancaster to $88,572 in Minot, but it is not a personal spending weight.

How the Price Gap Changed

Lancaster and Minot share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 21.0 to 11.2 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 20.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (25.5 to 5.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Lancaster RPP Minot RPP Relative Gap
2008 100.2 79.2 21.0 points Lancaster higher
2012 97.8 90.9 6.9 points Lancaster higher
2016 99.4 89.6 9.7 points Lancaster higher
2020 97.9 92.5 5.3 points Lancaster higher
2024 98.3 87.0 11.2 points Lancaster higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lancaster
98.3
Minot
87.0
Goods
Lancaster
100.7
Minot
95.7
Services
Lancaster
107.3
Minot
72.9
Rents
Lancaster
93.8
Minot
63.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Minot for the same purchasing power:

In Lancaster In Minot Difference
$50,000 $44,286 $-5,714
$75,000 $66,429 $-8,571
$100,000 $88,572 $-11,428
$150,000 $132,858 $-17,142
$ in Lancaster = in Minot

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 87.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Minot
87.0
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Minot more expensive than Lancaster?

Minot is 11.4% less expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 87.0 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Minot equals $100K in Lancaster?

A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $88,572 in Minot. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lancaster and Minot?

Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Minot is at 63.2 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.