Overall
Diff +2.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kenosha is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster.
Kenosha, WI is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.1 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $102,912 in Kenosha; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:WI 98.3→101.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.9 RPP
Diff +5.5 RPP
Diff -21.4 RPP
Diff +2.0 RPP
| Category | Lancaster | Kenosha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 101.1 | +2.9 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 106.2 | +5.5 |
| Services | 107.3 | 85.9 | -21.4 |
| Rents | 93.8 | 95.8 | +2.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Services creates the largest separation: Kenosha is 21.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Kenosha, WI is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.9-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kenosha is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lancaster to $102,912 in Kenosha, but it is not a personal spending weight.
What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Kenosha for the same purchasing power:
| In Lancaster | In Kenosha | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,456 | +$1,456 |
| $75,000 | $77,184 | +$2,184 |
| $100,000 | $102,912 | +$2,912 |
| $150,000 | $154,368 | +$4,368 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 101.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster and Kenosha share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 3.6 to 2.9 RPP points. Kenosha remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 14.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (6.7 to 21.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lancaster RPP | Kenosha RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 100.2 | 103.7 | 3.6 points Kenosha higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 99.3 | 1.5 points Kenosha higher |
| 2016 | 99.4 | 100.2 | 0.9 points Kenosha higher |
| 2020 | 97.9 | 99.4 | 1.5 points Kenosha higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 101.1 | 2.9 points Kenosha higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Kenosha is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 101.1 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $102,912 in Kenosha. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Kenosha is at 95.8 (national average = 100). Kenosha has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.