Overall
- Lancaster
- 98.3
- Fort Collins-Loveland
- 101.1
Diff +2.9 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fort Collins-Loveland is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster.
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.1 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $102,922 in Fort Collins-Loveland; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:CO 98.3→101.1
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +2.9 RPP
Diff -4.6 RPP
Diff -25.1 RPP
Diff +26.8 RPP
| Category | Lancaster | Fort Collins-Loveland | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 101.1 | +2.9 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 96.1 | -4.6 |
| Services | 107.3 | 82.2 | -25.1 |
| Rents | 93.8 | 120.6 | +26.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Fort Collins-Loveland is 26.8 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.9-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Fort Collins-Loveland is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lancaster corresponds to $102,922 in Fort Collins-Loveland.
What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Fort Collins-Loveland for the same purchasing power:
| In Lancaster | In Fort Collins-Loveland | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,461 | +$1,461 |
| $75,000 | $77,191 | +$2,191 |
| $100,000 | $102,922 | +$2,922 |
| $150,000 | $154,383 | +$4,383 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 101.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster and Fort Collins-Loveland share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.0 to 2.9 RPP points. Fort Collins-Loveland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 21.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.3 to 26.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lancaster RPP | Fort Collins-Loveland RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 100.2 | 97.2 | 3.0 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 104.7 | 6.9 points Fort Collins-Loveland higher |
| 2016 | 99.4 | 101.4 | 2.0 points Fort Collins-Loveland higher |
| 2020 | 97.9 | 98.5 | 0.6 points Fort Collins-Loveland higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 101.1 | 2.9 points Fort Collins-Loveland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Fort Collins-Loveland is 2.9% more expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 101.1 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $102,922 in Fort Collins-Loveland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Fort Collins-Loveland is at 120.6 (national average = 100). Fort Collins-Loveland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.