Overall
Diff -2.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Merced is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston.
Merced, CA is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 100.7). A $100,000 salary in Kingston buys about the same as $97,583 in Merced; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:CA 100.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -2.4 RPP
Diff +5.5 RPP
Diff +24.7 RPP
Diff -31.5 RPP
| Category | Kingston | Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.7 | 98.3 | -2.4 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 105.2 | +5.5 |
| Services | 133.6 | 158.3 | +24.7 |
| Rents | 110.2 | 78.6 | -31.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Merced is 31.5 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Merced, CA is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston, NY, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.4-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kingston is above 100 while Merced is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kingston corresponds to $97,583 in Merced.
What a salary in Kingston would need to be in Merced for the same purchasing power:
| In Kingston | In Merced | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,792 | $-1,208 |
| $75,000 | $73,187 | $-1,813 |
| $100,000 | $97,583 | $-2,417 |
| $150,000 | $146,375 | $-3,625 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kingston and Merced share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 12.9 to 2.4 RPP points. Kingston remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 68.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (43.9 to 24.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kingston RPP | Merced RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 107.1 | 94.3 | 12.9 points Kingston higher |
| 2012 | 102.0 | 98.6 | 3.5 points Kingston higher |
| 2016 | 101.2 | 95.3 | 5.9 points Kingston higher |
| 2020 | 101.6 | 98.7 | 2.8 points Kingston higher |
| 2024 | 100.7 | 98.3 | 2.4 points Kingston higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Merced is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 100.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kingston has the same purchasing power as $97,583 in Merced. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kingston are indexed at 110.2 while Merced is at 78.6 (national average = 100). Kingston has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.