Overall
Diff -2.5 RPP
Kingston vs Lancaster
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston.
2.4% less expensive
Lancaster, PA is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston, NY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 100.7). A $100,000 salary in Kingston buys about the same as $97,565 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 100.7 (Kingston) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
- $100k in Kingston ≈ $97,565 purchasing power in Lancaster
- Services drives the gap (-26.3 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:PA 100.7→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE NY × PA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +1.0 RPP
Services
Diff -26.3 RPP
Rents
Diff -16.4 RPP
| Category | Kingston | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.7 | 98.3 | -2.5 |
| Goods | 99.7 | 100.7 | +1.0 |
| Services | 133.6 | 107.3 | -26.3 |
| Rents | 110.2 | 93.8 | -16.4 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Kingston 100.7
Lancaster 98.3
Goods
Kingston 99.7
Lancaster 100.7
Services
Kingston 133.6
Lancaster 107.3
Rents
Kingston 110.2
Lancaster 93.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 26.3 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Lancaster, PA is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston, NY, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.5-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kingston is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kingston to $97,565 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Kingston
100.7
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Kingston would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Kingston | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,783 | $-1,217 |
| $75,000 | $73,174 | $-1,826 |
| $100,000 | $97,565 | $-2,435 |
| $150,000 | $146,348 | $-3,652 |
$ in Kingston = in Lancaster
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.7 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Kingston and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.0 to 2.5 RPP points. Kingston remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 29.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (45.5 to 16.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kingston RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 107.1 | 100.2 | 7.0 points Kingston higher |
| 2012 | 102.0 | 97.8 | 4.3 points Kingston higher |
| 2016 | 101.2 | 99.4 | 1.8 points Kingston higher |
| 2020 | 101.6 | 97.9 | 3.7 points Kingston higher |
| 2024 | 100.7 | 98.3 | 2.5 points Kingston higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster more expensive than Kingston?
Lancaster is 2.4% less expensive than Kingston. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 100.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Kingston?
A $100,000 salary in Kingston has the same purchasing power as $97,565 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Kingston and Lancaster?
Rents in Kingston are indexed at 110.2 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Kingston has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.