Overall
- Killeen-Temple
- 91.1
- Naples-Marco Island
- 103.2
Diff +12.1 RPP
Killeen-Temple vs Naples-Marco Island
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Naples-Marco Island is 13.2% more expensive than Killeen-Temple.
13.2% more expensive
Naples-Marco Island, FL is 13.2% more expensive than Killeen-Temple, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.2 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Killeen-Temple buys about the same as $113,242 in Naples-Marco Island; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 91.1 (Killeen-Temple) vs 103.2 (Naples-Marco Island)
- $100k in Killeen-Temple ≈ $113,242 purchasing power in Naples-Marco Island
- Rents drives the gap (+51.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:FL 91.1→103.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE TX × FL
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Killeen-Temple would need to be in Naples-Marco Island for the same purchasing power:
| In Killeen-Temple | In Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $56,621 | +$6,621 |
| $75,000 | $84,932 | +$9,932 |
| $100,000 | $113,242 | +$13,242 |
| $150,000 | $169,863 | +$19,863 |
$ in Killeen-Temple = in Naples-Marco Island
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 103.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Killeen-Temple, TX and Naples-Marco Island, FL sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Naples-Marco Island is above 100 while Killeen-Temple is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Naples-Marco Island 51.6 points higher than Killeen-Temple. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Killeen-Temple corresponds to $113,242 in Naples-Marco Island.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Killeen-Temple
- 93.8
- Naples-Marco Island
- 96.2
Diff +2.5 RPP
Services
- Killeen-Temple
- 81.2
- Naples-Marco Island
- 87.8
Diff +6.5 RPP
Rents
- Killeen-Temple
- 77.9
- Naples-Marco Island
- 129.4
Diff +51.6 RPP
| Category | Killeen-Temple | Naples-Marco Island | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 103.2 | +12.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 96.2 | +2.5 |
| Services | 81.2 | 87.8 | +6.5 |
| Rents | 77.9 | 129.4 | +51.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Killeen-Temple 91.1
Naples-Marco Island 103.2
Goods
Killeen-Temple 93.8
Naples-Marco Island 96.2
Services
Killeen-Temple 81.2
Naples-Marco Island 87.8
Rents
Killeen-Temple 77.9
Naples-Marco Island 129.4
Vertical line = national average (100)
Killeen-Temple
91.1
Cost Index
Naples-Marco Island
103.2
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Killeen-Temple and Naples-Marco Island share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 9.8 to 12.1 RPP points. Naples-Marco Island remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 12.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.6 to 6.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Killeen-Temple RPP | Naples-Marco Island RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.5 | 104.3 | 9.8 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2012 | 94.1 | 101.6 | 7.5 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 103.8 | 8.6 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2020 | 91.9 | 99.1 | 7.2 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
| 2024 | 91.1 | 103.2 | 12.1 points Naples-Marco Island higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Naples-Marco Island more expensive than Killeen-Temple?
Naples-Marco Island is 13.2% more expensive than Killeen-Temple. The overall cost index is 103.2 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
What salary in Naples-Marco Island equals $100K in Killeen-Temple?
A $100,000 salary in Killeen-Temple has the same purchasing power as $113,242 in Naples-Marco Island. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Killeen-Temple and Naples-Marco Island?
Rents in Killeen-Temple are indexed at 77.9 while Naples-Marco Island is at 129.4 (national average = 100). Naples-Marco Island has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.