Overall
- Kenosha
- 101.1
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff -2.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 2.6% less expensive than Kenosha.
Walla Walla, WA is 2.6% less expensive than Kenosha, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 101.1). A $100,000 salary in Kenosha buys about the same as $97,430 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WI:WA 101.1→98.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -2.6 RPP
Diff -1.2 RPP
Diff +8.5 RPP
Diff -9.2 RPP
| Category | Kenosha | Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 101.1 | 98.5 | -2.6 |
| Goods | 106.2 | 105.0 | -1.2 |
| Services | 85.9 | 94.3 | +8.5 |
| Rents | 95.8 | 86.6 | -9.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 9.2 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Walla Walla, WA is 2.6% less expensive than Kenosha, WI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.6-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kenosha is above 100 while Walla Walla is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kenosha corresponds to $97,430 in Walla Walla.
What a salary in Kenosha would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:
| In Kenosha | In Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $48,715 | $-1,285 |
| $75,000 | $73,072 | $-1,928 |
| $100,000 | $97,430 | $-2,570 |
| $150,000 | $146,145 | $-3,855 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.1 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kenosha and Walla Walla share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.1 to 2.6 RPP points. Kenosha remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 43.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.3 to 8.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kenosha RPP | Walla Walla RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.7 | 95.6 | 8.1 points Kenosha higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 95.1 | 4.1 points Kenosha higher |
| 2016 | 100.2 | 96.3 | 3.9 points Kenosha higher |
| 2020 | 99.4 | 95.2 | 4.2 points Kenosha higher |
| 2024 | 101.1 | 98.5 | 2.6 points Kenosha higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Walla Walla is 2.6% less expensive than Kenosha. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 101.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kenosha has the same purchasing power as $97,430 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kenosha are indexed at 95.8 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Kenosha has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.