Kenosha vs Charleston-North Charleston

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Charleston-North Charleston is 0.2% less expensive than Kenosha.

0.2% less expensive

Charleston-North Charleston, SC is 0.2% less expensive than Kenosha, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 101.0 vs 101.1). A $100,000 salary in Kenosha buys about the same as $99,846 in Charleston-North Charleston; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 101.1 (Kenosha) vs 101.0 (Charleston-North Charleston)
  • $100k in Kenosha ≈ $99,846 purchasing power in Charleston-North Charleston
  • Rents drives the gap (+24.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WI:SC 101.1→101.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WI × SC
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Kenosha
101.1
Cost Index
Charleston-North Charleston
101.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Kenosha, WI and Charleston-North Charleston, SC are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Charleston-North Charleston is 24.0 points higher. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kenosha corresponds to $99,846 in Charleston-North Charleston.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Kenosha
101.1
Charleston-North Charleston
101.0
Goods
Kenosha
106.2
Charleston-North Charleston
96.3
Services
Kenosha
85.9
Charleston-North Charleston
88.2
Rents
Kenosha
95.8
Charleston-North Charleston
119.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Kenosha would need to be in Charleston-North Charleston for the same purchasing power:

In Kenosha In Charleston-North Charleston Difference
$50,000 $49,923 $-77
$75,000 $74,884 $-116
$100,000 $99,846 $-154
$150,000 $149,769 $-231
$ in Kenosha = in Charleston-North Charleston

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.1 → 101.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Charleston-North Charleston more expensive than Kenosha?

Charleston-North Charleston is 0.2% less expensive than Kenosha. The overall cost index is 101.0 vs 101.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Charleston-North Charleston equals $100K in Kenosha?

A $100,000 salary in Kenosha has the same purchasing power as $99,846 in Charleston-North Charleston. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Kenosha and Charleston-North Charleston?

Rents in Kenosha are indexed at 95.8 while Charleston-North Charleston is at 119.8 (national average = 100). Charleston-North Charleston has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.