Kenosha vs Santa Fe

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Santa Fe is 2.3% less expensive than Kenosha.

2.3% less expensive

Santa Fe, NM is 2.3% less expensive than Kenosha, WI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.8 vs 101.1). A $100,000 salary in Kenosha buys about the same as $97,675 in Santa Fe; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 101.1 (Kenosha) vs 98.8 (Santa Fe)
  • $100k in Kenosha ≈ $97,675 purchasing power in Santa Fe
  • Rents drives the gap (+12.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WI:NM 101.1→98.8

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WI × NM
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Kenosha
101.1
Santa Fe
98.8
Goods
Kenosha
106.2
Santa Fe
96.1
Services
Kenosha
85.9
Santa Fe
76.7
Rents
Kenosha
95.8
Santa Fe
108.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Santa Fe is 12.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Santa Fe, NM is 2.3% less expensive than Kenosha, WI, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.4-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Kenosha is above 100 while Santa Fe is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kenosha corresponds to $97,675 in Santa Fe.

Kenosha
101.1
Cost Index
Santa Fe
98.8
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Kenosha would need to be in Santa Fe for the same purchasing power:

In Kenosha In Santa Fe Difference
$50,000 $48,837 $-1,163
$75,000 $73,256 $-1,744
$100,000 $97,675 $-2,325
$150,000 $146,512 $-3,488
$ in Kenosha = in Santa Fe

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (101.1 → 98.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

How the Price Gap Changed

Kenosha and Santa Fe share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.7 to 2.4 RPP points. Kenosha remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 18.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.9 to 12.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Kenosha RPP Santa Fe RPP Relative Gap
2008 103.7 98.0 5.7 points Kenosha higher
2012 99.3 102.1 2.9 points Santa Fe higher
2016 100.2 98.4 1.8 points Kenosha higher
2020 99.4 96.6 2.8 points Kenosha higher
2024 101.1 98.8 2.4 points Kenosha higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Santa Fe more expensive than Kenosha?

Santa Fe is 2.3% less expensive than Kenosha. The overall cost index is 98.8 vs 101.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Santa Fe equals $100K in Kenosha?

A $100,000 salary in Kenosha has the same purchasing power as $97,675 in Santa Fe. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Kenosha and Santa Fe?

Rents in Kenosha are indexed at 95.8 while Santa Fe is at 108.0 (national average = 100). Santa Fe has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.