Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Jacksonville
- 99.5
Diff -0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Jacksonville is 0.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Jacksonville, FL is 0.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 99.5 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $99,405 in Jacksonville; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:FL 100.1→99.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Kennewick-Richland, WA and Jacksonville, FL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Jacksonville is 15.0 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Jacksonville is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland corresponds to $99,405 in Jacksonville.
Diff -0.6 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff -6.0 RPP
Diff +15.0 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Jacksonville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 99.5 | -0.6 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 93.6 | 87.5 | -6.0 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 109.8 | +15.0 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Kennewick-Richland and Jacksonville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 5.4 to 0.6 RPP points. Kennewick-Richland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 30.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (24.5 to 6.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Jacksonville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.2 | 99.6 | 5.4 points Jacksonville higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 99.0 | 0.4 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2016 | 97.4 | 99.3 | 2.0 points Jacksonville higher |
| 2020 | 99.8 | 96.4 | 3.4 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2024 | 100.1 | 99.5 | 0.6 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Jacksonville for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Jacksonville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,703 | $-297 |
| $75,000 | $74,554 | $-446 |
| $100,000 | $99,405 | $-595 |
| $150,000 | $149,108 | $-892 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 99.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Jacksonville is 0.6% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 99.5 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $99,405 in Jacksonville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Jacksonville is at 109.8 (national average = 100). Jacksonville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.